A student of mine is searching for a research topic and is interested in the term “feminism” but wants to know what the opposite term would be. He explains that he wonders what it’s called when one supports men’s rights based on the concept that men deserve equal rights, just like women.
I explain gently that the term “feminism” was coined to address the oppression of women, and that there isn’t wide scale oppression of men in the world because one cannot be oppressed if one has most of the power. I try to help him understand that, by definition, “oppression” implies being held down against one’s will, which can only be done to one with less power than the oppressor.
This is a smart kid–perhaps even “gifted,” raised in an ultra-conservative household. I know of children like this; they’re idealistic, concerned with fairness, and relatively capable of abstract thought. Therefore, he can conceive of this other concept, and thinks it unfair that there is no word for it. He wasn’t persuaded by my explanation. I’ll admit I was a bit frustrated. Perhaps I should explain the definition of “chauvinism.”
Another student, a girl, is studying issues of feminism today, and is in constant conflict with her boyfriend over this. He wants to know why HE gets blamed for everything whenever she starts researching this topic. She says that when she reads about feminism, she expresses her outrage and he takes it personally and then tells her to choose another topic because this one makes her so “upset.”
Gently, I suggest to him that perhaps he could respond differently. Perhaps he could commiserate with her as to the issues of oppression women face. Perhaps he could try to be less defensive. He replies that there is “nothing [he] can do about it.” I suggest that perhaps he could notice sexism more, and speak out about it. He’s defensive because it’s “not my fault; I don’t oppress women; women can run for president” and doesn’t understand what else there is to do. We’ve removed the legal barriers, haven’t we?
He demands to know examples of institutionalized sexism but he narrows “institutionalized” to mean only actual policies that exclude women. I give him the US military and professional basketball, then throw in dry cleaning and altering fees, and he agrees he’s never considered those.
Any suggestions, wise ones? How do I explain this without ruffling the feathers of my constituency?

Comments 4
I’d send him to NOMAS. Both of the guys, actually. Hearing arguments from men about why feminism is important might help.
I get this all the time teaching anything about gender issues. Whenever people who are privileged are asked to take responsbility for that privilege, some of them are going to feel threatened. Others are going to feel overwhelmed by guilt. It takes careful naivgating to get people to want to do something about it.
Posted 09 Jun 2007 at 8:32 am ¶I’d never heard of NOMAS. Thank you!
National Organization for Men Against Sexism
Posted 09 Jun 2007 at 9:16 am ¶http://www.nomas.org
misandry - hatred of men.
Posted 16 Jun 2007 at 6:04 am ¶Although the MSM will never use it.
I was hoping for something that could be used to describe a LOVE of women, but gynephile was the closest I could come up with and apparently that’s been used with another meaning in the past.
Posted 16 Jun 2007 at 1:25 pm ¶Trackbacks & Pingbacks 1
[...] back I posted about a couple of my students who were a little fuzzy on the whole “feminism” concept. [...]